Does the COVID Jab Kill Extra Individuals Than It Saves?

In response to U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention information,1 greater than 1 million extra deaths — that’s, deaths in extra of the historic common — have been recorded because the COVID-19 pandemic started two years in the past, and this can’t be defined by COVID-19.

Deaths from coronary heart illness, hypertension, dementia and plenty of different diseases rose throughout that point.2 “We have by no means seen something prefer it,” Robert Anderson, CDC’s head of mortality statistics, advised The Washington Put up in mid-February 2022.3

In response to College of Warwick researchers, “the size of extra non-COVID deaths is massive sufficient for it to be seen as its personal pandemic.”4 Numerous explanations have been provided, together with the truth that lockdowns and different COVID restrictions discouraged or prevented folks from looking for care. However one other, much less mentioned issue might also be at play.

Internationally, loss of life charges have risen in tandem with COVID shot administration, with the most-jabbed areas surpassing the least-jabbed by way of extra mortality and COVID-related deaths. This flies within the face of official claims that the photographs forestall extreme COVID an infection and decrease your threat of loss of life, be it from COVID or all causes.5

Boosted? You are Now at Highest Threat of COVID

Ever because the announcement that the COVID “vaccines” could be utilizing novel mRNA gene switch expertise, I and plenty of others have warned that this seems to be a really unhealthy thought.

Quite a few potential mechanisms for hurt have been recognized and detailed in earlier articles, and we’re now seeing a few of our worst fears come to bear. “Totally vaccinated” people are each extra more likely to be contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 and extra more likely to die, whether or not from COVID or another trigger.

As reported by investigative journalist Jeffrey Jaxen within the April 22, 2022, Highwire video above, information from Walgreens’ COVID-19 tracker6 reveal that COVID-jabbed people are testing optimistic for COVID at greater charges than the unjabbed. What’s extra, individuals who obtained their final shot 5 months or extra in the past have the very best threat.

As you’ll be able to see within the screenshot beneath, in the course of the week of April 19 by way of 25, 2022, 13% of unvaccinated examined optimistic for COVID (with Omicron being the predominant variant). (The info reviewed by Jaxen are from the week of April 10 by way of 16.)

Of those that acquired two doses 5 months or extra in the past, 23.1% examined optimistic, and of those that acquired a 3rd dose 5 months or extra in the past, the optimistic price was 26.3%. So, after the primary booster shot (the third dose), individuals are at biggest threat of testing optimistic for COVID.

positivity rate by vaccination status

A deeper dive into the info7 reveals that two doses seem to have been protecting for a short time, however after 5 months, it turns into internet dangerous. The group faring worst of all is the 12 to 17 cohort, the place nobody with one dose examined optimistic, however after the second dose, instances instantly seem, and get greater nonetheless after 5 months. After the third dose, optimistic instances drop a bit, however then shoot up greater than ever after 5 months.8

Deaths by Vaccination Standing within the UK

Knowledge units from the U.Okay. authorities reveal an equally disturbing development. The uncooked information from the Workplace for Nationwide Statistics9 is tough to interpret, so Jaxen had information analysts create a bar graph to higher illustrate what the info really inform us. A screenshot from Jaxen’s report is beneath.

all cause mortality relative risk

Bars going upward are an excellent factor, because it signifies the danger for all-cause mortality based mostly on vaccination standing is both regular or lowered. Bars that dip beneath zero p.c are indicative of elevated all-cause mortality, based mostly on vaccination standing.

As you’ll be able to see, the all-cause mortality price is between 100% and 300% larger amongst individuals who obtained their first dose 21 days or extra in the past. The chance for all-cause loss of life can also be considerably elevated amongst those that obtained their second dose at the very least six months in the past, and mildly elevated amongst those that obtained their third dose lower than 21 days in the past. As of January 2022, all who obtained a number of doses at the very least 21 days in the past have been dying at considerably elevated charges.

Extra Jabs, Extra COVID Deaths

lindsay tweet animation

>>>>> Click on right here <<<<<

In every single place we glance, we discover traits displaying the COVID photographs are leading to greater loss of life charges. Above is an animated illustration10 from Our World In Knowledge, first displaying the vaccination charges of South America, North America, Europe and Africa, from mid-December 2020 by way of the third week of April 2022, adopted by the cumulative confirmed COVID deaths per million in these nations throughout that very same timeframe.

Africa has had a persistently low vaccination price all through, whereas North America, Europe and South America all have had quickly rising vaccination charges. Africa has additionally had a persistently low COVID mortality price, though a slight rise started round September 2021. Nonetheless, it is nowhere close to the COVID loss of life charges of North America, South America and Europe, all of which noticed dramatic will increase.

Here is one other one,11 additionally sourced from Our World In Knowledge, first displaying the surplus loss of life price within the U.S. (the cumulative variety of deaths from all causes in comparison with projections based mostly on earlier years), between January 26, 2020, and January 30, 2022, adopted by an illustration of the tandem rise of vaccine doses administered and the surplus mortality price. It clearly reveals that as vaccination charges rose, so did the surplus mortality price.

lindsay tweet animation us

>>>>> Click on right here <<<<<

Threat-Profit Evaluation Condemns the COVID Jabs

At this level, we additionally take pleasure in a couple of risk-benefit evaluation, and all present that, with only a few exceptions, the COVID jabs do extra hurt than good. For instance, a risk-benefit evaluation12 by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and impartial researcher Kathy Dopp, printed in mid-February 2022, concluded that the COVID jab is deadlier than COVID-19 itself for anybody below the age of 80.

They checked out publicly accessible official information from the U.S. and U.Okay. for all age teams, and in contrast all-cause mortality to the danger of dying from COVID-19. “All age teams below 50 years previous are at larger threat of fatality after receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than an unvaccinated individual is prone to a COVID-19 loss of life,” Seneff and Dopp concluded. And for youthful adults and youngsters, there isn’t any profit, solely threat.

“This evaluation is conservative,” the authors notice, “as a result of it ignores the truth that inoculation-induced antagonistic occasions akin to thrombosis, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, and different vaccine-induced accidents can result in shortened life span.

When one takes into consideration the truth that there’s roughly a 90% lower in threat of COVID-19 loss of life if early therapy is offered to all symptomatic high-risk individuals, one can solely conclude that mandates of COVID-19 inoculations are ill-advised.

Contemplating the emergence of antibody-resistant variants like Delta and Omicron, for many age teams COVID-19 vaccine inoculations end in greater loss of life charges than COVID-19 does for the unvaccinated.”

The evaluation can also be conservative within the sense that it solely considers COVID jab fatalities that happen inside one month of injection. As demonstrated by the U.Okay. information above, the danger of all-cause loss of life is almost 300% larger for many who obtained a second dose at the very least six months in the past.

Teenagers Are at Dramatic Threat of Dying From the Jabs

Equally, an evaluation13 of information within the U.S. Vaccine Antagonistic Occasions Reporting System (VAERS) by researchers Spiro Pantazatos and Herve Seligmann means that in these below age 18, the photographs solely improve the danger of loss of life from COVID, and there isn’t any level at which the shot can forestall a single COVID loss of life, regardless of what number of are vaccinated.

For those who’re below 18, you are a whopping 51 occasions extra more likely to die from the jab than you might be to die from COVID if not vaccinated. Within the 18 to 29 age vary, the shot will kill 16 for each individual it saves from dying from COVID, and within the 30 to 39 age vary, the anticipated variety of vaccine fatalities to forestall a single COVID loss of life is 15.

Solely while you get into the 60 and older classes do the dangers between the jab and COVID an infection even out. Within the 60 to 69 age group, the shot will kill one individual for each individual it saves from dying of COVID, so it is a tossup as as to if it is likely to be value it for any given individual.

How Many Are We Keen to Sacrifice?

We even have a risk-benefit evaluation by researchers in Germany and The Netherlands. The evaluation was initially printed June 24, 2021, within the journal Vaccines.14 The paper precipitated an uproar among the many editorial board, with a few of them resigning in protest.15 In the long run, the journal merely retracted it — a technique that seems to have turn out to be norm.

After an intensive re-review, the paper was republished within the August 2021 subject of Science, Public Well being Coverage and the Regulation.16 The evaluation discovered that, “very doubtless for 3 deaths prevented by vaccination we should settle for that about two folks die as a consequence of those vaccinations,” the authors wrote in a Letter to the Editor17 of Scientific and Translational Discovery. Defending their work, they went on to notice that:18

“The database we based mostly our evaluation on was a big naturalistic examine of the BioNTech vaccine in Israel. This was the one examine on the time that allowed for a direct estimation of an absolute threat discount (ARR) in mortality.

Admittedly, the ARR estimate was solely accessible for a brief commentary interval of 4 weeks after the primary vaccine dose, a degree raised by critics. One might need wished an extended commentary interval to convey out the good thing about vaccinations extra clearly, and our estimate of a quantity wanted to vaccinate (NNV) of 16 000 to forestall one loss of life might need been overly conservative.

The lately printed 6-month interim report of the BioNTech-regulatory scientific trial now covers a interval lengthy sufficient to allow us to have a look at this threat profit ratio as soon as once more. In Desk S4 of this publication, 14 deaths are reported within the placebo group (n = 21 921) and 15 within the vaccination group (n = 21 926).

Amongst them, two deaths within the placebo-group have been attributed to COVID-19, and one within the vaccination group was attributed to COVID-19 pneumonia. This results in an ARR = 4.56 × 10–5, and conversely to an NNV = 1/ARR = 21 916 to forestall one loss of life by COVID-19. This reveals that our unique estimate was not thus far off the mark.

The latest security report of the German Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) that covers all reported unwanted effects because the vaccination marketing campaign started (27 December 2020 till 30 November 202119 … reviews 0.02 deaths per 1000 BioNTech vaccinations or 2 per 100 000 vaccinations.

We had gleaned 4 mortality instances per 100 000 vaccinations (all vaccines) from the Dutch pharmacovigilance database LAREB. Utilizing the info of Thomas et al., a liberal NNV = 20 000, we are able to calculate that by 100 000 vaccinations we save 5 lives.

Utilizing the PEI pharmacovigilance report for a similar product, we see that these 100 000 vaccinations are related to two deaths, whereas utilizing the LAREB database again in June 2021, they have been related to 4 deaths throughout all vaccines and are related to two deaths in the latest reviews in regards to the BioNTech vaccine … In different phrases, as we vaccinate 100 000 individuals, we’d save 5 lives however threat two to 4 deaths.”

The chance-benefit ratio could also be even worse than that, although, as these calculations don’t bear in mind the truth that passive pharmacovigilance information “are infamous for underestimating casualties and unwanted effects,” the authors notice, or the truth that extreme unwanted effects akin to myocarditis are affecting younger males at a staggering price, which might cut back lifespan in the long term.

We Do Not Have a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System

In an August 2021 editorial, editor-in-chief of Science, Public Well being Coverage and the Regulation, James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., wrote:20

“There are two messages from those that maintain appointed workplaces or different influential positions in Public Well being on long-term vaccine security.

The primary message is that long-term randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled scientific trials will not be crucial for the long-term examine of vaccine security as a result of we have now ‘pharmacovigilance’; i.e. long- time period post-market security surveillance that’s supported by broadly accessible, passive vaccine antagonistic occasions monitoring methods.

The second message is that any use of these exact same vaccine antagonistic occasions monitoring methods that results in the inference or conclusion that vaccines may trigger critical antagonistic occasions or loss of life is unsupported by such methods …

When these looking for help for public well being initiatives, akin to a brand new vaccination program, supply proof that long-term vaccine security research are effectively in hand because of the potential for detecting antagonistic occasions that occurred following vaccination, they’re both:

(a) unaware that the vaccine antagonistic occasions monitoring methods upon which they’re basing their confidence about society’s capacity to detect and observe vaccine antagonistic occasions are alleged to be unable for use to deduce causal hyperlinks between well being outcomes and vaccination publicity, or:

(b) collaborating in a disinformation marketing campaign to finish scrutiny over the absence of correctly managed long-term randomized scientific trials to evaluate long- time period vaccine security. Neither of those is adequate empirical foundation for the information declare of long- time period security …

There have to be room for disagreement in science; in any other case, science doesn’t exist. It’s unhappy to bear witness to the truth that science has degenerated right into a warfare towards undesirable and inconvenient outcomes, conclusions and interpretations by way of the method of post-publication retraction for points apart from fraud, grave error in execution, and plagiarism.

The weaponization of the method of retraction of scientific research is effectively underway, and it induces a bias that may very well be referred to as “retraction bias”, or, within the case wherein a couple of individuals hang-out journals in the hunt for research that forged doubt on their business merchandise, a ‘ghouling bias,’ which ends up in biased systematic evaluations and warped meta-analyses.”

In his editorial, Lyons-Weiler particularly criticized the Vaccine journal for its retraction of the risk-benefit evaluation cited above, and mocked the editorial board members who give up in protest, noting that “Rage-quitting isn’t science.”

“The resigning editorial board members’ information declare is that no deaths have occurred as a result of vaccination program. As useful as that declare is likely to be to a prescribed narrative, it isn’t based mostly on empirical proof, and it’s, subsequently, unwarranted,” Lyons-Weiler wrote.21

“From a Popperian view of science, one can see the deadly flaw within the editorial board members’ information declare: if, as they insist, passive vaccine antagonistic occasions monitoring methods can not check the speculation of causality, then how can editorial board members, resigning or in any other case, know that the occasions have been NOT attributable to the vaccine? …

It’s logical to conclude that since passive vaccine antagonistic occasion monitoring methods don’t lend themselves effectively to testing hypotheses of causality, they don’t present the chance to design and conduct sufficiently crucial checks of causality, and subsequently a substitute system is required … one that’s appropriate to detect threat.”

Whereas we could certainly want higher pharmacovigilance, there’s actually little question at this level that the COVID jabs are ill-advised for most individuals. I imagine that within the years to come back, folks will look again presently and vow to by no means repeat it. Within the meantime, all we are able to do is have a look at and assess the info we do have, and make selections accordingly.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart